117 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
117 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
|
# Module Brief Validation Checklist
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Core Identity
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Module code follows kebab-case convention
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Module name is clear and memorable
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Module category is identified
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Target users are clearly defined
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Unique value proposition is articulated
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Vision and Concept
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Problem being solved is clearly stated
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Solution approach is explained
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Module scope is well-defined
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Agent Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] At least one agent is defined
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Each agent has a clear role and purpose
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Agent personalities are defined (if using personality themes)
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Agent interactions are mapped (for multi-agent modules)
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Key commands for each agent are listed
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Workflow Ecosystem
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Core workflows (2-3) are identified
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Each workflow has clear purpose
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Workflow complexity is assessed
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Input/output for workflows is defined
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Workflow categories are logical
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## User Experience
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Primary use case is documented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] User scenarios demonstrate value
|
||
|
|
- [ ] User journey is realistic
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Learning curve is considered
|
||
|
|
- [ ] User feedback mechanism planned
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Technical Planning
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Data requirements are identified
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Integration points are mapped
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Dependencies are listed
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Technical complexity is assessed
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Performance requirements stated
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Development Roadmap
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Phase 1 MVP is clearly scoped
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Phase 2 enhancements are outlined
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Phase 3 polish items listed
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Timeline estimates provided
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Deliverables are specific
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Risk Management
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Technical risks identified
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Usability risks considered
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Scope risks acknowledged
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Mitigation strategies provided
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Open questions documented
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Creative Elements (Optional)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Personality theme is consistent (if used)
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Special features add value
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Module feels cohesive
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Fun elements don't compromise functionality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Documentation Quality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] All sections have content (no empty placeholders)
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Writing is clear and concise
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Technical terms are explained
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Examples are provided where helpful
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Next steps are actionable
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Implementation Readiness
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Brief provides enough detail for create-module workflow
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Agent specifications sufficient for create-agent workflow
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Workflow descriptions ready for create-workflow
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Resource requirements are clear
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Success metrics are measurable
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Final Validation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Module concept is viable
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Scope is achievable
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Value is clear
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Brief is complete
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Ready for development
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Issues Found
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Critical Issues
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<!-- Must be fixed before proceeding to build -->
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Recommendations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<!-- Suggested improvements -->
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Nice-to-Haves
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<!-- Optional enhancements -->
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Validation Complete:** ⬜ Yes / ⬜ With Issues / ⬜ Needs Revision
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Validated By:** **\*\*\*\***\_**\*\*\*\***
|
||
|
|
**Date:** **\*\*\*\***\_**\*\*\*\***
|